A recent study from Dutch bank ING has found that cash still reigns supreme.

thumbnail

Were you thinking that cryptocurrency mass adoption was just around the corner? Well, perhaps think again. A recent study from Dutch bank ING has found that cash still reigns supreme.

ING says in its report that general sentiments towards cryptocurrencies and their usefulness “have not changed drastically” since the bank conducted a similar survey a year ago. The survey interviewed a total of 14,824 people from 15 countries including Europe, Australia and the US.

Golden coins on abstract city and business chart background. Finance and economy concept. Double exposure

Knowledge about cryptocurrency still low
The overwhelming outcome was that, of those surveyed, most still don’t know much about cryptocurrency.

What we see is that people aren’t looking for cryptocurrencies to replace other monetary forms any time soon. In fact, physical cash, a medium which may have been presumed to be on the way out, retains very high every-day acceptance.

Of the 12,813 people asked if cryptocurrencies have a central controlling body, 21 percent said that they do, and 52 percent said they didn’t know. Just 27 percent of people recognized that cryptos are not centrally controlled.

That said, 74 percent acknowledged cryptocurrencies are types of digital currency and 63 percent noted that the values of digital currencies were constantly changing.

ING, survey results
ING survey results to basic questions
What’s more, 51 percent of those interviewed believed that cryptocurrencies are “accepted by most stores.” The word “most” is somewhat ambiguous, but as ING points out “most online shops don’t accept them [cryptocurrency].”

Low knowledge leads to positivity
Interestingly, those that have low to medium knowledge about cryptocurrency appear to be the most confident about them. Perhaps this should be a lesson to us all, just because an individual is positive about cryptocurrency, it doesn’t mean they actually know what they’re talking about, some might call it the Dunning-Kruger effect.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back To Top